Safe Drinking Water Act Essay

Show More

The average household uses around 350 gallons of clean water daily, so imagine our lives without clean water available whenever we needed it. Currently, water is plentiful and we don’t give a second thought to how often we actually use it in our day to day lives. Every day we use water for cooking, cleaning, bathing, irrigating and other common jobs. If water for some reason became scarce in today’s society, the effects could be fatal. There would soon be a costly price put on the ability to enjoy clean, fresh water.
The first thing we, as American’s, do whenever there is a shortage of something, in this case something very valuable, such as clean water, is no longer make this necessity free. Soon our water would be sold at an inflated…show more content…

Making a pot of coffee could be more expensive than going to Starbucks daily. Cleaning would be out of the question for most households, and indoor plumbing would come to a stop. The average American is already having trouble staying afloat in these times and economic struggles, adding the extra cost of clean water into their budget could be life altering. The rate of homeless people would definitely rise with a crisis like this, as well as the death rate. Waterborne diseases and the absence of sanitary drinking water would kill younger children, who have weak immune systems, and even adults, resulting in a dramatic decline in our population.
Without clean, unpolluted irrigation water, farmers would not be able to grow their crops or irrigate their fields that feed their livestock, resulting in a shortage of all food groups. Now not only would the nation be suffering from a scarcity of clean water, but also food. Our nation would have to import foods in from other countries, making the prices of food practically unaffordable. This will increase the crime rate, because what people can’t buy, they will steal. The money being lost from stolen goods could potentially shut stores down, boosting unemployment. More people without jobs would prevent them from being able to purchase food or water, and with that, less money would be made to import more of these items to support our nation.
All in all, water is one element mankind cannot live without.

Essay/Term paper: Clean water act

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Law

See all college papers and term papers on Law

Need a different (custom) essay on Law? Buy a custom essay on Law

Need a custom research paper on Law? Click here to buy a custom term paper.


Keep Our Water Clean

The Clean Water Act has made advances to our society that have helped our
environment to flourish with life. The objective of the Act when it was enacted in 1972
was to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation"s
water. This objective was accompanied by other statutory goals to eliminate the discharge
of pollutants into waters used by boats by 1985 and to attain waters deemed "fishable or
swimmable" by 1983. So far, the Act has done exactly what it was meant to do. Its
purpose is being served and we our benefiting with clean water.

No where in the context of the Clean Water Act does it say anything about
respecting the convenience of businesses wishing to dump their toxins into our waters.
The Act was not meant to please everyone, but it was meant to clean our water, and that
should please a wide majority. We should not have to sacrifice our health for a business
that does nothing for us. Clean water is much more of a priority to us citizens than is the
well being of a company that we probably have never heard of and never will.

If the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1995 are passed, all that we have worked
for since 1972 will be lost. It will take all of the advances made to clean our water and
totally reverse them. This bill will take apart the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System, leaving loopholes for businesses desiring to pollute our waters. This bill also
demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the state of scientific and technological knowledge in
the area of water quality. It will corrupt our water in such a way as to totally abolish the
Clean Water Act, rendering it obsolete.

The intent of the of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1995 is to increase
flexibility on businesses, States, local governments, and landowners. This increase in
flexibility is meant to relax some regulations dealing with the discharge of wastes and
stormwater into waterways, authority of States to rely on voluntary measures to control
nonpoint source pollution, limit Federal authority to restrict land use in wetlands, and
require the Federal Government to reimburse landowners for loss of property value
resulting from wetlands regulations. All of these measures will make it easier for toxins to
be thrown into our drinking water by businesses with no remorse.

This bill is supposedly supposed to help our environment, but it seems to me that
this bill is driven by political and economic interests, rather than the well being of our
environment. Why should we be more linient in the protection of our water so a business
may have a place to dump its wastes in. Rather, we should enforce the protection of our
water so that businesses are forced to go elsewhere with their wastes. Our water is far to
valuable for it to be polluted and toxicated with whatever it is being dumped into it. Our
water is sacred to use for its value in public and economic health and the enactment of this
bill will devastate this goal we strive for.

This bill was written on behalf of some of the most notorious polluters of our
environment and I seriously doubt that fact that their goal is to better our environmental
status. They are out to make things easier for their businesses to get rid of their wastes by
dumping them into our water. The realize that this water is used by many, yet they fell no
guilt in their acts of corruption. They could care less for our health, their main concern is
money. If dumping their wastes into our water would help them to save money, they are
all for it. The well being of our economy is irrelevant to them. It is not of their concern.

Those in favor of the bill state that it would still maintain the restrictions protecting
our waterways, and at the same time, give business a little more freedom to do their
business. This freedom that the bill proposes is exactly what we do not want. This freedom
that we grant them will be enough to destroy our waterways for good. Soon these
businesses will expand this minimal freedom to absolute freedom to dump their pollutants
wherever they please if we grant them this freedom. We must give no freedom if we care
for the long-term survival of our water supply.

By passing this bill and giving the responsibility of clean water legislation to the
States rather than the Federal Government, we are inviting these notorious polluters to
take command over our waterways to use them for whatever we please. Clean water is a
common goal among all States and it should be granted to all States by the Federal
government. By giving this responsibility to the States, we make room for polluters to
take advantage of single States and use them for their dumping. This cannot happen if we
want to preserve our clean water. This will not happen under the status quo.

The Clean Water Act that presides has done miracles for our environment. It has
cleaned up our waterways, preserved our wetlands, and basically, enriched our lives with
clean, fresh water that, after the first glass, leaves us yearning for more. Just the thought
of having to drink water that was even slightly under par sickens me. I am not willing to
sacrifice my cool clean water for the benefit of some money hungry business. I am sure
that many feel the same way. We love our water and will not give it up. If this bill is
passed, it will send our newly flourishing environment skyrocketing down the charts of
serenity, hence, bringing us back to where we were before the original Clean Water Act
took effect. I"ve never seen a an amendment to an act that totally reverses the act in all
ways. If we want clean water, we must do away with this putrid, beast of a bill.
 

Other sample model essays:

Law / Commercial Vices

Commercial Vices The commercial vices are gambling, prostitution, and drugs. The appeals of the commercial...

Law / Common Law - Development Of Defence Of Provocation

Legal System and Method Question: Critically evaluate the development of common law principles applicable to the defence of provocation in criminal law from the decision in Mancini v DPP [1942] ...

Law / Commonsense Control, Not Gun Control

It's late at night, and you're home all alone. You double checked to make sure all of the doors were locked and made sure all of the windows were closed. It's been a quiet night, but for some odd...

Law / Computer Crimes

The computer has evolved a great deal since its creation over a third of a century ago. The uses of the computer now seem endless. Unfortunately some of those uses include computer crimes. This ...

Law / Computor Generated Evidence In Court

Introduction We are living in what is usually described as an 'information society' and as the business community makes ever greater use of computers the courts are going to find that increasing...

Law / Confederation- An Act Or A Pact

Kenneth Pang 1/4/96 CRIME AND PUNISHMENT Ever since the beginning of modern society, crime and punishment have been linked together. Depend on the seriousness of the crime, those who break th...

Law / Contracts 3

A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by law. Modern business could not exist without such contracts. Most business transactions involve commitments to furnish goods, services, or real pro...

Law / Contracts

A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by law. Modern business could not exist without such contracts. Most business transactions involve commitments to furnish goods, services, or real pro...

Law / Court

COURT EXPERIENCE I went to the court session on Wednesday afternoon at 2:00 and stayed until around 4:35. They did not start court though until a little after 2. Before court started every...

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *